As mentioned in my previous post, the way I measure the amount of drug released from the gel, I take aliquots of the solvent in the vial into tubes at different times. Each time I place some solvent in a tube, I replace the solvent in the vial. After a certain time, I place a small sample of each tube onto a plate reader. The plate reader is then placed into a spectrometer which measures the absorbance of the sample of a particular wavelength of light. The results from the spectrometer transferred to an excel document look like this
Firstly, as shown by the high R2 value, a linear approximation is appropriate, and so the equation listed in the graph is used to calculate the concentration of each of the samples from the absorbance in the plate reader. After a series of unit conversions, I was able to calculate the mass released from each gel at each time point. Furthermore, a calculated the cumulative release of each gel. To calculate this, I add the mass of a particular time point with the masses of all the time points before it. This is done because the solvent is replaced at each time point. Then, I calculated the theoretical amount of drug within each gel. This can be calculated because the percentage of drug in the gel is known by how I created the gels.
After all of these calculations, I created two graphs. The first graph shows the cumulative amount of drug divided by the total amount of drug for each gel at each time point. The second graph shows the mass at each time point divided by the cumulative release of that gel. “Average” is used because for each type of gel, there were three samples for repetition. In the graph, rather than having twenty-seven different lines, I averaged each sample of each gel. “Control” is a gel without a salt or acid.
One trend shown in these graphs is that a higher concentration of a specific salt/acid has a faster release than the lower concentration of the same salt/acid. Furthermore, the salt/acid mostly had slower releases then the control group. However, my data suggests that the gels were not mixed very well. When I mixed the gels, I connected two syringes and pushed the contents of one syringe into another multiple times. If the gel in the syringe was not mixed well, then some parts of the syringe will have large concentrations of drug, while other parts would have lower concentrations of drug. As one syringe is used for three samples of a gel (for example, one syringe has ~800 mg of gel and so ~200 mg of gel is placed into each vial), the release would be different between the samples. This is shown in the table below.
In addition to this bad mixing, the gels also finished releasing relatively quickly then previous studies done in the lab. Usually, it takes approximately 4-5 days for the gel to finish releasing, while my gels finished in about 1-2 days. A gel is finished releasing when the lines become horizontal in the graph. This may not be a mistake in procedure, but possibly because I used smaller gels and smaller vials, which no one has really used before.
And so, next week, I plan to start a new release study with one control and another compound. In addition to seeing the drug release from these new drugs, I will test another variable: size, specifically surface area and volume. To do this, for each gel, I will have samples of different masses. With this, I can my technique (particularly mixing), see if my variability in results was caused by size of my gels, and hopefully find a relationship between size and release.
Thanks for reading!
Russell Llave
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteFascinating! Thanks for including images of the graphs that you created - is this information automatically transferred to Excel, or do you manually enter your measurements?
ReplyDeleteAlso, how does data suggest that the gels were not successfully mixed? Is it possible that the smaller gels/vials and faster release could also serve as a way to expedite experimentation? That would be a neat (and time saving) finding!
The data on the absorbence are automatically transferred to excel.
DeleteIn the procedure, I get one syringe and put a polymer into it, and I get another syringe with drug/salt dissolved in water. To mix it, I connect the two syringes and push the contents back and forth. When I first push the drug solution into the polymer syringe, the front of the polymer syringe would have the most drug. When I push the contents twice, the drug goes a little farther into the polymer, yet most of the drug content stays in the front. Thus, the more I mix, the drug becomes more evenly balanced within the gel. If I don't mix enough, different parts of the gel have more or less drug. After mixing the contents, I push all the contents into one syringe and then pour out three gels (A, B, and C). So (looking at the last excel doc), the data suggests that first third of the gel had more drug, and the next third had less drug, and the last third had even less drug. That's how I knew the gels were not mixed successfully I hope that all made sense.
I think it has a slight difference in time, but that difference is not very significant.
I love your graphs! Is your experiment a variation on the standard procedure for your lab? Was the idea to use smaller vials and less gel your own idea or just a consequence of not having a lot of materials? Why did you choose smaller vials and less gels?
ReplyDeleteThe only variation is that I used smaller materials, and I did that just to save resources. After multiple trials, I may use larger gels to see the differences and to better compare my results to previous studies the lab has done.
DeleteI'm a visual learner, so your graphs are a great aid to my understanding of your results. It seems that despite some of the more unexpected results of this week's work, you seem to be close to finding a relationship between the size of gel and the rate of release. Keep up the great work!
ReplyDeleteAhhh, so many graphs!!
ReplyDeleteI applaud you on your research endeavors...this looks really legit and very professional and complicated, but it sounds like you're having a good experience. :)
Can't wait for your next post!